Articles

The Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act Delusions

August 11, 2022
A7eb9a6c374bae36f308eae9fd126cbf

Democrats are belting out hosannas for the Inflation Reduction Act. President Biden says it’ll “immediately help” his party’s candidates for the midterms this fall, while Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer calls it “a game-changer.” The New York Times declared that this “sweeping legislation” gives Democrats “an unfamiliar feeling: hope.”

Maybe this bill will let Democrats escape what was shaping up to be a midterm whooping. But I’m skeptical.

For starters, if the bill doesn’t immediately reduce inflation, it’s going to be impossible to hide from voters. Americans will experience higher prices every day—when they go to the supermarket, shop for the kids’ new school year or pull into the gasoline station.

Democrats insist the bill will slash prices by spending $433 billion and creating new taxes totaling $739 billion. But nonpartisan experts believe it’ll have no noticeable downward pressure on prices—including the Congressional Budget Office (“negligible at best”), the Bipartisan Policy Center (“small impacts one way or the other”), and the Penn Wharton Budget Model (“statistically indistinguishable from zero”).

By contrast, some of the ways the bill will raise costs and hurt growth begin almost immediately. Take the book minimum tax, which hits companies with at least $1 billion in income in their financial statements. They’ll pay 21% of taxable income or 15% of the income reported to investors, whichever is greater. It falls with particular violence on manufacturing companies. They’re already examining what it’ll do to their taxes, so workers in adversely affected businesses could soon see pay cuts, reduced hours, or even layoffs. That’s not likely to gin up enthusiasm for Democrats.

The bill also establishes that beginning in January, drug companies must pay a rebate if prescription prices for Medicare recipients rise faster than inflation. To cover that difference, drug companies will likely raise prices for non-Medicare patients, perhaps before year’s end.

The bill’s green-energy subsides are much bigger for companies using union labor. This payoff to big labor bosses may have the unintended effect of alienating nonunion blue-collar workers who feel Democrats stacked the deck against them.

Then there’s the $80 billion Internal Revenue Service expansion so the IRS can double its audits. Millions of honest taxpayers and small businesses may reasonably fear that they’ll lose time and money to bureaucrats needlessly rooting around in their tax returns.

Democrats may think they’ll get lucky on timing, that the economy will bounce back on its own and obscure the real effects of their bill. Americans received good news Wednesday with July’s flat consumer-price index, largely because of a 4.6% month-over-month decline in energy prices. But as with April’s good inflation news, this doesn’t mean the struggle is over. The CPI was still up 8.5% year over year. The core price index is 5.9% higher than this time last year, driven in part by July increases in costs for food, rent and new cars.

How can we decide if Democrats are right to praise their new bill or just desperate? The president’s job-approval rate sits at 39.9%, with 56% disapproving, according to the RealClearPolitics average. His handling of the economy is even less popular, with 63.4% disapproval, and 71.9% of voters believe the country is going in the wrong direction. Let’s check these numbers again after Labor Day.

If they improve significantly, it would suggest that a growing number of voters believe Mr. Biden and congressional Democrats have a good plan—that against economic logic, they somehow managed to lower prices and strengthen growth by pumping more demand into an inflation-ridden economy through increased government spending and using higher taxes to confiscate capital, profits and income.

But if these numbers don’t improve appreciably, Democrats can know for certain that all their present celebrating of the Inflation Reduction Act was not only premature but unwarranted. I’m betting that’s the case, and if I’m right, their party is in for a particularly painful midterm.

Read More at the WSJ

Related Article

9c031df2f72b7f564754f1d3ce8982ce
June 11, 2026 |
Article
The New York Times’s Sunday interview with Scott Pelley, formerly of CBS’s “60 Minutes” is a gobsmacker. ...
47eaa529e5162b52b40a1a13e11e2a48
June 04, 2026 |
Article
The primaries Tuesday in California, Iowa, Montana, New Jersey, South Dakota and New Mexico provide insight into how the midterms are shaping up. ...
A073348fc173127d8442f652aa330425
May 28, 2026 |
Article
Say what you will, President Trump’s endorsement is still mighty powerful in primaries. Last week, seven days before Tuesday’s Senate runoff in Texas, Mr. Trump endorsed the scandal-plagued state attorney general, Ken Paxton, over Sen. John Cornyn. ...
12cb2f9cf332d357d47c632da13a97d4
May 21, 2026 |
Article
Now that the Virginia Supreme Court has thrown out state Democrats’ attempted gerrymander, the battlefield for the House this fall is coming into focus. ...
Button karlsbooks
Button readinglist
Button nextapperance