Articles

How the GOP Can Win the Medicaid Debate

May 22, 2025
96c8ef131c2170c2bed0dea92a3fc427

These are dark days for Democrats. Their party’s favorability rating is at a record low. Its working-class support has collapsed. A new book confirms the White House covered up President Biden’s mental decline. The Democratic National Committee is embroiled in internecine war. President Trump’s relentless forward motion makes him look strong, while Democrats look weak and woke.

But Republicans should beware. They have two big messaging problems. If not confronted soon, they could create major difficulties in the 2026 midterms. This column will address the first challenge, Medicaid.

The current House Republican proposal would cut the program’s spending by nearly $700 billion over the next decade, according to preliminary Congressional Budget Office analysis. That’s a big number. GOP leaders, however, seem disinclined to explain what they’ll cut and why. It’s as if they believe that if they’re discussing Medicaid, they’re losing.

If so, that’s wrong. GOP silence will make the inevitable Democratic assault more powerful. And Republicans have a lot of ammo with which to prevail on this front. The federal government admits it made $543 billion in inappropriate Medicaid payments from 2015 through 2024. Some experts think the real number is $1.1 trillion. Either way, it’s close to what the GOP wants to cut. 

Here’s a possible script for a Republican Medicaid offense:

Start by declaring a strong commitment to save the program. Because of Democratic policies, Medicaid is spending hundreds of billions on people it shouldn’t—those who are able-bodied and working-age. Republicans want this assistance to go to the people it was meant for—the elderly poor, disabled, and children in low-income families. Without reform, the program on which those Americans depend is at risk of rapidly becoming unsustainable.

The GOP should say that able-bodied adults on Medicaid should be required to work or look for work. “No freeloaders” on a program meant for the truly vulnerable is a powerful argument. A Feb. 25 Kaiser Family Foundation poll found 62% of Americanssupport “requiring nearly all adults to work or be looking for work” to qualify for Medicaid, while 38% were opposed. If told that such a requirement “could ensure that Medicaid is reserved for groups like the elderly, people with disabilities, and low-income children,” it was 77% support, 22% oppose. 

Also drive home that—unlike radical Democrats—Republicans oppose illegal immigrants getting Medicaid. House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Brett Guthrie (R., Ky.) estimates that 1.4 million illegal aliens receive Medicaid. That isn’t only wrong; it encourages more aliens to try to cross our border illegally.

Make clear that Republicans want to end fraud while Democrats are content to perpetuate it. Specifically, Democrats have made it harder for states to check their rolls frequently for ineligible Medicaid recipients. For the sake of fairness and accountability, the GOP will make it easier to find and remove those who don’t qualify.

In sum, Republican reforms will help stop the government from wasting Medicaid dollars that elderly and disabled Americans need. 

On Tuesday, President Trump’s team posted on X a video of him declaring: “We don’t want any waste, fraud, or abuse. Very simple—waste, fraud, abuse. Other than that, we’re leaving it.” That may be sufficient for the White House, but GOP candidates facing voters next year need to do more. They must embrace reform and show they’re comfortable talking about Medicaid. They have to shout from the mountaintops that Democrats oppose work requirements, favor giving Medicaid to illegal aliens, and won’t allow states to remove ineligible recipients from their rolls.

Republicans should admit that their changes will cost some people coverage, then endlessly drive home who those people are: illegal aliens, able-bodied people who refuse to work, and others who don’t qualify for Medicaid under existing law. Most Americans will find this argument entirely reasonable.

Read More at the WSJ

Related Article

A039080191aa8446747a6e85ba41025b
July 23, 2026 |
Article
It’s a seductive tale. Nasty villains with evil plans to make us miserable. But they can be beaten. When they are, life will be fuller and more rewarding with peace and harmony forever. All you have to do is elect us. ...
42d93a7bf80d0ce2c83b04d3bdf35791
July 16, 2026 |
Article
While a few primaries are still ahead, each party’s fall lineup is coming into focus. Republicans should have four things going for them, Democrats five. ...
Bc2e1563661b07f73e67f43a094d7b2f
July 09, 2026 |
Article
America is politically polarized and narrowly divided. In the last presidential election, Donald Trump received 49.8% of the aggregate popular vote, while Kamala Harris got 48.3%. By that measure, it was the fourth-closest White House contest since 1888. ...
D0f88d7161a6bc3b0a5326f83056cda2
July 02, 2026 |
Article
It hangs where I see it every day I’m home. The years have taken their toll. The paper has turned brown, the words have faded. It’s one of the last remnants of my childhood, a gift from my taciturn Norwegian father. ...
Button karlsbooks
Button readinglist
Button nextapperance