Last week Donald Trump easily surpassed the most important number in American politics: 270. But 270 electoral votes isn’t the only sum that matters. Vote totals do, too, and both parties should be concerned about what their candidate got last week.
The Democrats’ problem is certainly bigger. In 2020, Joe Biden received 81.3 million votes. As of Wednesday, with about 2.2 million votes in California to count, Vice President Kamala Harris had received 72.4 million nationwide.
What happened to the millions of Americans who voted for Mr. Biden but not Ms. Harris? Most didn’t go to Mr. Trump. His 2024 tally so far is 75.6 million, up from 74.2 million four years ago. Even if that difference entirely came from former Biden voters, that leaves 7.5 million unaccounted for. Only a small fraction could have gone to the Green Party. (It won just over 400,000 votes in 2020 and about 700,000 this time.) If even a third of these missing Democrats had turned out to vote and stayed loyal, Ms. Harris might now be planning her inaugural address.
Why didn’t they vote? Ignore crackpot theories that Democrats manufactured millions of fake ballots in 2020 and mysteriously neglected to do so this time. There are two good explanations. First, Mr. Biden’s performance in office turned off many Democratic voters. Second, Ms. Harris failed to re-energize them in her abbreviated campaign of just over 100 days.
The Fox News/AP voter analysis—looking at polling conducted by the National Opinion Research Center between Oct. 28 and Nov. 5—supports this. The NORC surveyed more than 120,000 early and Election Day voters. Only 29% said America was headed in the right direction. Just 42% approved of Mr. Biden’s handling of the presidency, with a mere 17% strongly approving. No party has ever kept the White House with numbers that bad.
The poll also revealed that Ms. Harris beat Mr. Trump on the questions of who has “the mental capability” and “moral character” to serve as president and tied with him on who respondents thought “looks out for people like you.” But she trailed him badly on the more important questions of who was a “strong leader,” who was “capable of handling a crisis” and who “has the right policy ideas.”
Ms. Harris had some outstanding moments, especially in the debate. But she couldn’t shake the impression that she was, in the Trump campaign’s words, “weak, failed, dangerously liberal.”
Still, she mounted a massive ground game. Fox pollster and University of Texas at Austin political scientist Daron Shaw says the Fox News/AP analysis showed that Ms. Harris’s campaign contacted more voters than Mr. Trump’s did in battleground states. But a higher percentage of those the Trump campaign did reach turned out for him in the end than showed up for Ms. Harris after her team’s door knocks and calls. Mr. Trump also did better among voters whom neither campaign reached personally. Whatever these voters read, saw or heard about the Republican on their own moved them to support him. His superior social-media influencer efforts likely provided a great assist here.
Though they have no reason to be as despondent as Democrats, Republicans should still look carefully at last week’s results. There’s reason to worry that the GOP may be in a tight spot come 2026 or 2028 if it doesn’t examine what happened in this election.
Mr. Trump increased his vote total between 2020 and 2024 by only around 2%. This was substantially smaller than his 2016 to 2020 bump up, when he netted an 18% jump.
